The best way is not always the most complex.
Such an observation may seem obvious, that the more simple the explanation or course of action, the better. Finding the simplest possible answer (without reckless generalization) is what scientific study strives for. Indeed, much of the struggle — yes, struggle — for expanding human understanding is the desire to simplify the world as we experience it.
Yet, in our experiences, complexities abound.
The intellectual tone of our time teaches us that discourse, the free and frank exchange of opposing and converging ideas, is the most comprehensive way to achieve understanding of a phenomenon. By taking into account multiple interpretations, the ultimate findings (if that is possible) will be better for it.
This is a fine way to create, test, and implement knowledge. This is, however, a terrible way to define one’s life.
Consider the oft-repeated analysis of our consumer society, how it is so steeped in choice; to weigh all choices as equally plausible would overwhelm the consumer. We live in the hypothetical paper towel aisle of the grocery store, expanded on a near-infinite scale. There are so many brands, textures, prints and degrees of quality — where does one begin?
One could spend a lifetime trying to figure out how to best spend that lifetime. It is no small marvel we can still breathe without the intervention of complexity.
Throughout much of his life, Mohandas Gandhi owned fewer possessions you and I have lost during an average week. His lifestyle represented similar simplicity. Yes, his political influence was vast and complex, but his daily existence was remarkable in its stark routine.
Gandhi moved social mountains not with excessive choice, but with a singular one. He chose as his purpose to achieve Indian independence via non-violent means, and to live a life in accordance to those peaceful principles.
That is not to say all of us must live like Gandhi. We need not even be instruments of peace; the choice, ultimately, is up to the individual to live in simplicity as they see fit.
Complexity, be it material, emotional or spiritual, continues to form a prison for our own existence. Gandhi confronted this mental prison by renouncing his privilege and possessions, simplifying as much of his life as possible to better enact his grandest goals.
Humans are, at core, simple beings. We all seek much the same things — love, safety, freedom — though they may be enacted in complex or simple ways.
We have been conditioned to believe that because we live in a complex world, we must seek complex ways to enact our goals, big or small.
This is nonsense.
Gandhi freed his homeland by making a single, simple choice. We would be wise to learn from his example.
Alex has had the same glasses for a decade, and can be reached at alexander.petrusek@asu.edu