Technology is a simple word with a tremendous amount of relevance. Almost everything we do on a daily basis for both entertainment and work is the result of someone’s scientific breakthrough.
Most likely, this breakthrough occurred recently in technology’s extensive timeline. Perhaps the most prominent discovery of this generation is social networking — a concept so monumental that it connects millions of average citizens from all over the world.
But are we truly reaping its benefits or just abusing this new technology?
A recent and fatal stabbing was apparently the result of a Facebook argument. According to gothamist.com, Kayla Henriques allegedly stabbed 22-year-old Kamisha Richards of Brooklyn on Feb. 28 The fight was over a seemingly trivial twenty-dollar loan Richards gave to Henriques for childcare items.
However, an exchange of threatening and explicit comments sent via Facebook escaladed the argument into something graver. Henriques is accused of stabbing Richards in the torso, which resulted in her death.
This tragedy, although instigated through Facebook, was most likely inevitable. I would not go as far to say that social networking was the culprit in this situation.
However, I do find that Facebook and other online sites give people a strange sense of liberation when it comes to expression. People are more comfortable with confrontation when it is done through a computer screen.
Hurtful words, crude comments and tough news are more easily expressed in print.
Psychologically, this seems to suggest that because the person is not physically saying it, the blow is lessened. In other words, a Facebook comment is more acceptable than cursing at someone in person.
Facebook, the social networking phenomenon established in 2004, has become the most recognized site of its kind.
It states on the Facebook website that there are now over 500 million active users. These 500 million people have the power to interact freely with “friends” they choose and in any way desired through the Internet.
“Facebook is a social utility that helps people communicate more efficiently with their friends, family and coworkers.” This quote comes directly from the Facebook website.
In a way, it is completely legitimate. As one of the many out-of-state students here at ASU, I understand the importance of accessible communication with friends and family. A short wall post is much easier than scheduling a time to talk on the phone when you simply want to say, “How about that Charlie Sheen parody?”
There is no denying that in some instances, social networking is just more practical.
The problem I have with Facebook’s claim of “efficient communication” is that there is a difference between efficient and easy. Communication over a virtual wall is easy, effortless and timely. And it eliminates awkward confrontation.
It is also impersonal and lazy, and it leaves emotions and connotations up to the recipient, often resulting in misconstrued messages. My point here is that technology is indeed both the liberator and oppressor.
But ultimately, it is up to individuals to determine what kind of influence they allow technology to have on their lives. If we do not find some balance, spoken communication might just become outdated.
Contact Isabelle at inovak@asu.edu
